Page 1 of 1

Re: Pod filters - for/against

Posted: Mon May 02, 2011 4:33 pm
by Pedda
Which option do you have in mind? Filters vs. stacks? Pods vs. stock filter?

Re: Pod filters - for/against

Posted: Mon May 02, 2011 5:10 pm
by Pop-Kat
If you want to keep the bike std or close to it then stock airbox is best and easiest, if your looking for performance gains then pods and a good pipe (eg vance & hines/eagle) will be better, but to do this you will have to spend more time and money on setting up the carbs..Is it worth it on an old bike ? thats the question... On my restoration Kat i'll have std airbox, on the big kat i'll have filters or bellmouths, but then it does have a 1230 engine and i want it to breath as well as possible, aswell as hear the sound of the flatslide rattling...music to my ears, haha :)

Re: Pod filters - for/against

Posted: Mon May 02, 2011 5:41 pm
by nokatanayet
most of bike i try to keep as standard,
kat3 is runnining pods with a harris pipe, whats its sound like i here you say, idon't know it won't fire up yet :lol: :lol: :lol:
there is a company near me which sells ramair filters for about £15 each if anyone is interested.