Post
by johnr » Sat Feb 12, 2011 3:04 pm
the problem is, its easy to slate the head of the council thats sacking lollypop men. but as attractive as that sounds, we all really know that if you keep the lollypop man and sack his boss, what happens when they want to sack the dinner lady, the binman, the street sweeper, the gritter driver(who is probably also the bin man!) etc etc the anger is being pointed at the councils chief execs, but for all their inflated salaries, councils need them. middle management doesnt shuffle paper round like in dilbert, it makes sure the binman et al gets paid, and the streetlights stay on and the law is complied with. not glamorous not fun but one of them shitty mundane jobs that needs doing which nobody ever notices till its not done. the anger should be directed to the people who slash the budgets for our councils whilst not cutting their own, those who have capitulated to the wishes of the city fatcats in the banks and delivered a mere slapped wrist over bonuses, in the same week its revealed that 10 million quid of the torys election fighting fund came from, guess where? yep, the city fatcats who run the banks and finance houses. who says that payback is a bitch eh! ive yet to see anyone say they are planning to cut mps pay or make their job harder for less money, the problem is, the cabinet is composed almost entirely of multi millionaires(cameron himself has a personal wealth estimated at 20 million) and i think their only experience of being poor was reading about it in the pages of dickens at oxbridge.